On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:03 -0800, Carol Spears wrote: > while i have no idea what the developers are doing, either as a group or > individually (it is always just a guess about everything and anything, > not just gimp stuff), i always thought that they kept the ability to > read psd to a minimum to force people away from stealing and using > photoshop. it would make sense if you look at it like a war.
I'd say quite contrary. Giving the abilkity to read PSD will make it possible for people to convert their old work and give them a way to "escape". > THEN i spent a week following things on #gimp some. there was lots of > talk and exchange of facts about the gimp raw plug-in. i haven't seen > anything here about the raw plug-in, but i did see that Adobe has > released an updated raw thing themselves. > > all this stuff, and i just got to sit back and ask myself, whatsup? > > Jakub, do you know whatsup with all this? As for the raw format (DG, Digital Negative), Adobe did the right thing and published the spec. [1] [1] - http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/main.html, http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/license.html -- Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
