> I really get peeved by these types of articles. GIMP is GIMP. Krita is > Krita. CinePaint is CinePaint. Each is a tool. Use the right tool for > the job. There are lots of hammers. Some are good for some projects. > Others are good for other projects. None are good for all projects. As > an author, he should know that and write accordingly. In this case, it > looks like he's more interested in publicly bashing one tool (which > would be an opinion piece, which this is not intended to be) instead of > trying to help his readers (a reference piece or review, which this *is* > intended to be). >
Nice retort. You should consider sending that to LJ's 'reader letters' section (which I always read as soon as my sub arrives in the mail). I've never been able to understand all the excessive bashing that GIMP regularly gets (UI complaints, color space limitations [which has never kept me from my day to day work], etc.). I use GIMP regularly and pretty much have zero complaints. It's a great, power horse application, and has been a solidly pleasant experience to use since 2.* in my opinion. BTW, I use GIMP mostly for web graphics and some print. Eric _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
