Hi, Sean wrote:
> The line flowing from this commit extends ~200 more commits downward
> before it is finally terminated with an arrowhead. It would be nice if
> this line could be made shorter, such that the arrowhead was drawn much
> closer to commit in question.
Good point. The arrowheads tend to get lost otherwise; in my tree, the
problem is even worse since the downward-pointing arrow (drawn in grey) is
directly below a horizontal line connecting two unrelated changes -- which
is *also* grey. That makes the actual arrowhead perceptually invisible.
If the arrow appears directly below a node, you don't get that problem.
Another point I just noticed: The arrows should be directly below
each other, if at all possible; i.e. the one pointing up should be in the
same column as the corresponding arrow pointing down.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
Money is the root of all evil, and man needs roots.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
