On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote:
>>> git is a core tool that people use on almost the smallest of boxes,
>>> perhaps even replacing rcs for managing local config files. On such
>>> machines, even perl may be large, but a second scripting language seems
>> You can compile Git without any of them.
> That ignores the 99% of people who use packaged versions.
The 99% of people who use packaged versions wouldn't care about the
>>> On a NetBSD 6 i386 system, the size of the ruby193-base
>>> binary package (as installed) is 25 MB (vs 15 MB for the git base
>>> package, which lacks gitk and docs). (Presently, the git base package
>>> defaults to requiring python and installing the git_remote_helpers, but
>>> I think that's a bug.) perl is 54 MB.
>> That's only the default, if the default doesn't suit you, don't use
>> the default.
> It's not about what I want.
It is exactly about what you want.
You use the argument that 99% of the people use packaged versions, yet
you ignore the fact that 99% of the people don't care about a single
extra dependency (specially one that would be transitory). It is all
about 1% of the users, in fact, not even that, because of this 1% of
users who dread extra dependencies, most of them would be happy that
it's only temporary, and eventually a heavier dependency would be
replaced with a lighter one. It is for all intents and purposes only
you, the person you are speaking on behalf of.
If the Git project considers a new dependency that would be needed in
addition to Perl for a finite period of time, your argument does
absolutely nothing to block this route.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html