Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes:

> I think Felipe is using the argument that perl is declining to answer
> the question "why didn't you write git-related in perl instead?";
> that's it.

A question which nobody asked, I presume?

I think we heard enough from packaging folks that a new dependency
is unwelcome.  Also we heard from no regular/high-value reviewers
that they feel comfortable reviewing additions in Ruby.

So at least for now, the conclusion is to take approach #1, i.e.
somebody who finds "related" a good addition rewrites it in Perl to
promote it out of contrib/ once the design issues settle (of course
it is still a possibility that no such volunteer appears).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to