Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> One example of killing the entire thread is when I see "This patch
>> will not be applied" by Felipe in a thread started with his patch.
>> I understand that it is his way to say "this patch is retracted"
>> without having to explicitly say that he now understands that
>> reviews showed why the patch was wrong or that he thanks the
>> reviewer for enlightening him.
> You are wrong. There's nothing wrong with the patch.
> ...
> I thought you understood that code should speak, but apparently you don't.

That is exactly the point Peff raised (and I agreed with), isn't it?

Bad behaviour (being difficult to work with) has consequences.  E.g.
convincing people that it is not worth their time interacting with
you, especially when there are better things to do like tending to
other topics, and you lose the chance to show that your patches are
good when they indeed are (I don't even know if these patches in
question are good, and I am not going to find out).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to