On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> One example of killing the entire thread is when I see "This patch
>>> will not be applied" by Felipe in a thread started with his patch.
>>> I understand that it is his way to say "this patch is retracted"
>>> without having to explicitly say that he now understands that
>>> reviews showed why the patch was wrong or that he thanks the
>>> reviewer for enlightening him.
>> You are wrong. There's nothing wrong with the patch.
>> ...
>> I thought you understood that code should speak, but apparently you don't.
> That is exactly the point Peff raised (and I agreed with), isn't it?
> Bad behaviour (being difficult to work with) has consequences.

It is not bad behavior. It is bad behavior *in your opinion*, an
opinion that wouldn't be shared by other projects, like the Linux

> E.g.
> convincing people that it is not worth their time interacting with
> you, especially when there are better things to do like tending to
> other topics, and you lose the chance to show that your patches are
> good when they indeed are (I don't even know if these patches in
> question are good, and I am not going to find out).

You are hurting the Git project by doing that, and our users,
specially our Windows users.

I thought you were a good maintainer. But apparently you would rather
listen to the people that only complain, rather than actual code, that
actually improves things.

Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to