On 29 April 2014 23:31:29 GMT+10:00, Felipe Contreras 
<felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>James Denholm wrote:
>> So that we can all have egg on our faces when it takes off and is
>> proven superior... Right?
>I don't know what you mean by "we", but it certainly doesn't include
>  % git log --author=nod.h...@gmail.com master
>  empty

Sure it does. I didn't (and don't) have any impact on the
debate and resulting community views, but I recall recently
that I prescribed to the arguments that default aliases
are a bad idea. I'm not arrogant enough to suggest that
my views matter at this point, but if git-fc is proven superior
by community adoption, I would be as wrong as anyone else
who held that view.

So I'll ask again - you've described frustration at the
pace of git development, and that you feel that your patches
aren't being accepted. If you feel that this is ultimately to the
fatal detriment of git, why are you still trying to convince
vegetarians to join you in hunting when you could simply find
a more willing group?

James Denholm.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to