alamb commented on code in PR #13717:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13717#discussion_r1885861429
##########
datafusion/core/src/catalog_common/information_schema.rs:
##########
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ fn get_udf_args_and_return_types(
.into_iter()
.map(|arg_types| {
// only handle the function which implemented
[`ScalarUDFImpl::return_type`] method
+ #[allow(deprecated)]
Review Comment:
Yeah -- it will take more effort on the DataFusion side, but I think it will
be much better on the downstream user side.
Now that DataFusion has more users, I think it makes sense that the balance
will be pointing a bit back
##########
datafusion/core/src/catalog_common/information_schema.rs:
##########
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ fn get_udf_args_and_return_types(
.into_iter()
.map(|arg_types| {
// only handle the function which implemented
[`ScalarUDFImpl::return_type`] method
+ #[allow(deprecated)]
Review Comment:
Yeah -- it will take more effort on the DataFusion side, but I think it will
be much better on the downstream user side.
Now that DataFusion has more users, I think it makes sense that the balance
will be going a bit more towards downstream users
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
