> Have you read the actual paper in Nature, or are you
> making assumptions based on news reports?
> Obviously, it would be much better to read the paper
> in Nature
Unfortunately the paper is behind a $30 subscription wall and while
Aston do subscribe to the paper copy from past experience (though I
can't remember whether it was Science or Nature I was after) I've got
that suspicion it'll be nearly a month before they'll have the issue
on the library shelves.
That doesn't prevent the paper from being extremely widely cited in
the media, one of many stories got linked by you in reply to my query.
If you have read the paper, does it actually say anything about flood
risk increasing in British summers due to climate change?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of
global environmental change.
Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not
gratuitously rude.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
