Discreditation by association? I don't know or care about the politics of Steven Milloy.
Here's an article on 'warming interupted' at realclimate. The relevance to this discussion is the climate shift in 1998/2001 - i.e. abrupt climate change. Simply saying that the >past 10 years is irrelevant because it is noise is not an explanation of the noise. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/07/warminginterrup... The 2009 Swanson and Tsonis paper was called - Has the climate recently shifted? The answer was yes - i.e the 'noise' is meaningful and the non warming might continue for another decade or 2. Please see my post on no warming for a decade on which there are a couple of other discussions referenced. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of global environmental change. Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not gratuitously rude. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
