"Denial" - a curious turn of phrase, under the circumstances.

In reality, the warming trend is continuing just as it has since the
1970s, to a statistically significant level.

See these two posts at Open Mind for a quick illustration of this:

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2009/12/07/riddle-me-this/
(i.e. temperatures are consistent with the long term warming trend -
well within the bounds of statistical significance.)

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/how-long/
(statistical analysis demonstrating that, given the level of short
term variance in global temperature data, you need more than 15 years
to quantify the underlying trend to a statistically significant level,
and that temperatures from now back to the 1970s are entirely
consistent with an ongoing warming trend of roughly 0.18 degrees per
decade.)

On 3 March 2010 09:34, Robert I Ellison <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> David - you may quibble about reasons or significance but outright
> denial is not a good look.
>
> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/global_temperatures_09.pdf
>
>
> On Mar 2, 11:54 am, "David B. Benson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mar 1, 3:01 pm, Robert I Ellison <[email protected]>
>> wrote:> ...
>> > ... the current warming hiatus ...
>>
>> does not exist by simple inspection of the decadal
>> GISTEMP averages I posted previously.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change. 

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude. 

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange

Reply via email to