On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 07:32 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I didn't have a deep look into the code yet, I just wonder how much a > >> browser plugin needs to depend on totem. > >> Would it make sense to have a more generic gstreamer browser plugin, > >> so there is no need for all gstreamer applications to write their own? > > > > Which GStreamer applications would need to write their own browser > > plugin? I'm counting none, which would make the point moot. > > That's the point, totem comes with a browser plugin to play embedded > videofiles and stuff, > but it pulls in a lot of totem. My point is why not have an > application independent plugin.
Because there would be a lot of duplicated code between the two otherwise. _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
