On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 14:17 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Mark Trompell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> I didn't have a deep look into the code yet, I just wonder how much a >> >>> browser plugin needs to depend on totem. >> >>> Would it make sense to have a more generic gstreamer browser plugin, >> >>> so there is no need for all gstreamer applications to write their own? >> >> >> >> Which GStreamer applications would need to write their own browser >> >> plugin? I'm counting none, which would make the point moot. >> > >> > That's the point, totem comes with a browser plugin to play embedded >> > videofiles and stuff, >> > but it pulls in a lot of totem. My point is why not have an >> > application independent plugin. >> >> I developed an example plugin that uses GStreamer directly. I don't >> think most of the stuff in totem is really required in a plugin, but >> on the other side my plugin is not that complete either. >> >> Would it make sense to provide this code? > > Feel free. And when you've implemented versions to support all 4 most > popular plugins, added playlist support, fullscreen, etc, let me know > how much smaller your plugin is ;)
It might be still smaller than totem plugin + totem + nautilus + libgnome + .. whatever totem pulls in as dependency. -- Mark Trompell Foresight Linux Xfce Edition Cause your desktop should be freaking cool (and Xfce) _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
