On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: >> Hi, >> I didn't have a deep look into the code yet, I just wonder how much a >> browser plugin needs to depend on totem. >> Would it make sense to have a more generic gstreamer browser plugin, >> so there is no need for all gstreamer applications to write their own? > > Which GStreamer applications would need to write their own browser > plugin? I'm counting none, which would make the point moot.
That's the point, totem comes with a browser plugin to play embedded videofiles and stuff, but it pulls in a lot of totem. My point is why not have an application independent plugin. -- Mark Trompell Foresight Linux Xfce Edition Cause your desktop should be freaking cool (and Xfce) _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
