On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Mark Trompell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I didn't have a deep look into the code yet, I just wonder how much a >>> browser plugin needs to depend on totem. >>> Would it make sense to have a more generic gstreamer browser plugin, >>> so there is no need for all gstreamer applications to write their own? >> >> Which GStreamer applications would need to write their own browser >> plugin? I'm counting none, which would make the point moot. > > That's the point, totem comes with a browser plugin to play embedded > videofiles and stuff, > but it pulls in a lot of totem. My point is why not have an > application independent plugin.
I developed an example plugin that uses GStreamer directly. I don't think most of the stuff in totem is really required in a plugin, but on the other side my plugin is not that complete either. Would it make sense to provide this code? -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
