On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 14:17 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Mark Trompell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 09:39 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> I didn't have a deep look into the code yet, I just wonder how much a > >>> browser plugin needs to depend on totem. > >>> Would it make sense to have a more generic gstreamer browser plugin, > >>> so there is no need for all gstreamer applications to write their own? > >> > >> Which GStreamer applications would need to write their own browser > >> plugin? I'm counting none, which would make the point moot. > > > > That's the point, totem comes with a browser plugin to play embedded > > videofiles and stuff, > > but it pulls in a lot of totem. My point is why not have an > > application independent plugin. > > I developed an example plugin that uses GStreamer directly. I don't > think most of the stuff in totem is really required in a plugin, but > on the other side my plugin is not that complete either. > > Would it make sense to provide this code?
Feel free. And when you've implemented versions to support all 4 most popular plugins, added playlist support, fullscreen, etc, let me know how much smaller your plugin is ;) _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
