On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 09:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 13:51 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 14:49 +0200, Mark Trompell wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Feel free. And when you've implemented versions to support all 4 most > > > > popular plugins, added playlist support, fullscreen, etc, let me know > > > > how much smaller your plugin is ;) > > > > > > It might be still smaller than totem plugin + totem + nautilus + libgnome > > > + .. > > > whatever totem pulls in as dependency. > > > > libnautilus-extension isn't a hard dependency, neither is libgnomeui. > > Check the output of configure. > > However, in effect it is for most people (except Gentoo users...), as > distributions are always going to build it with these options enabled.
Yes, and then we use sub-packages. The only thing most distributions still depend on is libgnomeui. We only need session management in GTK+ to be able to remove that dependency. Totem on the OLPC only depends on GTK+. > The split suggested by Milosz later in the thread would probably help to > address this... And it would make working on Totem, and making releases a pain in the neck. _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
