On 4/12/2010 7:55 PM, RJack wrote:
Title 17 USC § 301
Preemption of state laws equivalent to copyright is irrelevant to the GPL, which is a copyright license authorizing others to practice some of the exclusive rights of the copyright holders, as per federal copyright law.
So... I'll ask the question once more. Where is the link to "BusyBox 0.60.3" which was registered and claimed in the SFLC lawsuit as the infringed work?
The SFLC lawsuit does not claim that BusyBox 0.60.3 is the infringed work, as can easily be seen by reading the complaint, <http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>. The defendants are required to make available the version of the BusyBox source code used to create the binary which they are copying and distributing, not the source to BusyBox 0.60.3. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list email@example.com http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss