Mario Goveia wrote: > > As you well know, I am not the ombudsman for Goanet. If you and the > other moderators see an obvious falsehood, don't you think you should > flag those posts and return them for re-consideration? > Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:31:51 -0400 From: "Bosco - Goanet Volunteer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > NO! > Mario asks: > NO??? If the moderators will not then how do you expect members who you don't even want to read every post, to do so? > Mario previously wrote: > > I have made the point repeatedly that Goanetters need not be interested > in every post, analyze every post or get involved in every discussion. > Bosco responded: > Follow your own advice. > Mario observes: > I never give advice I don't follow myself. However, wasn't it you, a Goanet moderator and admninstrator, who asked me why I don't correct every falsehood written on Goanet? Now you are asking me to not to be interested in every post. You can't have it both ways. > Mario previously wrote: > > As I have said above, I have never objected to anyone's right to post > calumnies and falsehoods. > Bosco responded: > Mario also said above: "I have made the point repeatedly that Goanetters need not be interested in every post, analyze every post or get involved in every discussion." and later on below:
"False, as I have demonstrated above because I have never denied anyone's free speech." > - What exactly is Mario saying?? > Mario observes: > What about this are you having a problem understanding? > As anyone can plainly see from my quotes you have cited, what I am exactly saying is as follows: > a) Goanetters need not be interested in every post, analyze every post or get involved in every discussion.. > b) I have never denied anyone's free speech, even their right to write falsehoods and calumnies, as long as others are allowed to correct those. > Mario previously wrote: > > How does what any Goanetter has written lead in any logical way to a > threat by a moderator like yourself to exclude an explanation for a > rejection? > Bosco responded: > This is not a threat. Just telling you in PLAIN English what is likely to happen. > Mario asks: > Why don't you tell us what is the connection between what any member writes and your THREAT to not provide an explanation for a rejection? Your comment makes no logical sense. > >
