On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:53:52 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please do not rely on Wikipedia! Any idiot can edit it and many do. > I wasn't relying on the quote, but more on the reference attached to it. But as you later state Gerv has nothing to do with the licensing any more. > The most recent thing I have seen about Firefox's trademark is > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622 which > also suggests Gerv is no longer relevant. Ok. I've read the thread so I think I'll wait for an official reply on the (trademark) bug I filed. > > Even if we can call it Firefox now (hurrah! but would it limit our > ability to issue bugfixes?), I'd prefer it not to contain the Firefox > icons unless their copyright licence has been changed. (It was a > copyright+trademark double-whammy problem before.) > Well, Mike do say that he's hoping to have a set of official ok patches to apply to the stable version and we should still be able to call it Firefox (and include icons). If we at GoboLinux has a patch that isn't already submitted by any of the large distro with rights to redistribute we have to submit it for review before we include it in our releases (if we want to call the browser Firefox), but to me this seems highly unlikely as either there will be an official Firefox release or a patch created by one of the "big ones" before we come up with a patch, so I don't really see a problem here. > Hope that helps, It helps. Thanks for keeping me down and updated. :) -- /Jonas Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
