On 9/29/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My fear is that any bugfix going into gobolinux will block on MozCorp > approval, which is simply unethical when we can do better. >
I'm not sure that is a practical concern. Who's creating these Gobo specific bugfixes. Firefox has a strong brand which MIGHT worth using against a hypothetical situation. > On a plus side, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told me about www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla > - > would we be better off using/helping the mythical IceWeasel instead? > Or should it be available as an alternative? > It should definately be available and if it's brand becomes strong/recognizable, an outright replacement (on the LiveCD) would be warranted. Otherwise the confusion for users would not be worth it. I have specific concerns of user agent string, .mozilla prefs dir and extension compatibility. Basic compatiblity issues with any fork as time goes on. -- Carlo J. Calica _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
