> And for API, the docs say I need a key, but the > threads,http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.google.api.maps/111257 > say I don't, for API3.
v3 is in development, why would you expect anything about that to be documented? > So can the person in charge here at Google give or point to > documentation as to just how much of Static Maps does not need a Key > please. This isn't Google, its a developers discussion group. > If they say it needs a Key, but it doesn't, then isn't that a bug, that > should be fixed, by closing the loophole, so it no longer works without > a key? Or is this all just a hit and miss operation? There's nothing to stop you regestering it as a formally bug if you so desire > Please don't say "you are using an undocumented area, so you're on > your own, good luck", as the documents say "first, get a key", I recall. I can't imagine there are any non-trivial software products that don't have features, easter eggs, developer tools, tracking tools and so on that allow things to happen that aren't in the documentation. If you can't bear the thought of something offering features over and above those documented, there aren't many facilities you'll be able to use at all. I think you're being silly ; if you do what the documents say and it works, whatever are you worrying about? cheers, Ross K --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
