On 30/10/13 17:50, Majken Connor wrote: > I think something to keep in mind is that we don't have to find THE 20 > people who are best for this group,
Right. > I also want to suggest maybe there needs to be a time period before a > person can vouch for new members? I think this is also normal in this type > of trust system and it also minimizes the damage to the trust structure if > someone makes it through by mistake. Nice idea. Although that would slow down the initial seeding. What sort of time period do you think would be appropriate? > Maybe Gerv could start an etherpad to track the proposal and proposals for > the proposal? ;) Good idea. I will do that when I get to work on Monday. > Or looping back we seem to be throwing out some of the work mrz and Reps > have done, should we ask those people who already did this work to alter > their proposal to reflect what's been discussed here? I'm sure they are reading :-) I think it makes sense to come up with a concrete counter-proposal, and then we can discuss its merits. Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
