On 01/11/13 22:39, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > To me vouching is more than just signaling someone has made a contribution > to Mozilla but that they have made a sustaining contributions and deserve > the trust of the community and project.
But that's the thing - you say "to me". I would assert that it's obvious that not many people share this view (although I do), and that because what it means to vouch for someone was not clearly defined early on, the bar has historically been very low. And even if we raise it now, we have a big grandfathering problem. > When people vouch someone they are guaranteeing that the person is > trustworthy and a sustained good contributor IMHO. Do you really think that all or most existing mozillians.org vouches had that level of trust associated with them? Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
