On 29/10/13 15:05, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > I understand the need to do downsides, but this seems like a very > harsh penalty. It would be easy to vouch for someone at some point, > and at some point 5 years in the future, that someone does something > bad and gets banned. Is it still fair for the original vouching person > to be penalized for that?
Good point. Perhaps the connection should expire after a year. > It seems like timeliness of the vouching must play a role here. The > scheme I just came up with is, once you get 2 people to vouch for you, > you get 4 points to vouch with for others (i.e. limiting the amount of > vouches you can give out, adding some cost to vouching). But, vouches > deteriorate over time, so after, say, a year, your 2 initial vouches > are worth less than 1.0, and your access gets revoked unless you find > some people to vouch for you again. Since people may migrate to > different areas of the community, it may make sense to have other > people vouch for you this time compared to last time. That seems more complex than the above suggestion. Do you think simply disconnecting voucher and vouchee after a year (i.e. after that, you stand on your own two feet) would work? Gerv _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
