Thank you, I appreciate the enlightening links and the information.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Nicholas Nethercote <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Catherine Murphy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Color me unimpressed unless you can show that there was, in fact, public > support from the majority at Mozilla who -- now, we are supposed to believe > -- was on his side. > > I can't give you clear evidence of majority support, though I believe, > based on the internal discussions I have witnessed, that is existed. > > But I won't leave you empty-handed. As far as I know there were five > employees -- out of approximately 1,000 -- who tweeted that Brendan > should resign as CEO. Here are six blog posts from employees who > supported Brendan's appointment, and blogged about that support before > he resigned. > > http://subfictional.com/2014/03/24/on-brendan-eich-as-ceo-of-mozilla/ > > http://bholley.wordpress.com/2014/03/31/on-brendan-eich-and-the-thought-police/ > https://staktrace.com/spout/entry.php?id=823 > http://patrickfinch.com/2014/03/31/the-most-important-decisions-we-make/ > https://ozten.com/psto/2014/03/28/pick-your-battles/ > > http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2014/03/25/Welcome-Brendan > ! > > Note that several of these basically said "I don't agree with Brendan > on gay marriage but I support his appointment as CEO nonetheless." > Unfortunately, the blunt tweets asking for a resignation inevitably > garnered far more attention than the long-form blog posts that tackled > the nuances of the issue. > > Nick > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
