> I have been thinking about this thread over the weekend and honestly it > seems like it is going the wrong direction in that some frustrations over > blog posts by Gerv are being aired versus talking about the actual proposed > changes. > > That being said as an atheist I disagree with much of what Gerv posts but > at the same time I welcome him being able to share a glimpse into his life > even if it is heavily Christian content. Maybe I am a little old school but > the reason Planet's exists is not to promote content related to the > project... If you think this is the case you are very much mistaken.
I don't think posting heavily Christian content is the problem. Gerv may do that whenever he feels the desire to do it, as long as he's unobtrusive about it. But it doesn't look that way. Saying "all other religions are false" is not unobtrusive. And don't tell me that being obtrusive is part of a person's religious world view. Because I doubt that this is the case. Being careful when posting controversial world views is just a matter of respect in my opinion. > Can we please not try to make our little corner of the web less open by > restricting views shared to whatever the most vocal thinks is politically > correct for Planet? As long as the line between the individual and the group is not crossed, then everything is fine. But reaching across the line (by inviting people, saying everyone who is not Christian has a false religion) should not be allowed. > TL;DR Why can't we agree to disagree on topics and page down instead of > censoring individual views of Mozillians. _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
