On 1/7/15 4:18 PM, Leo McArdle wrote:> On 08/01/15 00:10, Al Billings wrote: >> I don't think it is too much to ask people to do the same, which is >> what the proposed policy suggests. > > Doesn't the proposed policy suggest that people be deliberate about what > they post to Planet, and start with a disclaimer if what they write > about is potentially divisive, not that they don't post religious content? >
You quoted the second part of the proposal but not the first: > Further, that we ask Planet's participating authors to: > > - add a "mozilla" tag to posts that are relevant to Mozilla, so that it's explicit that their inclusion in Planet is deliberate' I ask you, if you know something is divisive, why post it to Planet at all? What's the motivation? It is pretty clear the posting about religion to Planet is divisive. Years and years of arguing about this very issue kind of proves it. Everyone involved that has been around for years knows it, including the authors of the recent posts on religion. I'm not sure why we have to do this dance over and over for years just because a few people feel the need to keep posting to Planet about religion. Can't they just post it to their blog but not send it to Planet? _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
