On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
<[email protected]> wrote:
> So, strawman (which IMO is reasonable): can we check irc.m.o for
> currently-public channels with 10 or more people in that are not currently
> being publicly logged, which are clearly project/product-related (rather
> than watercooler chat stuff), and ask channel owners for all of them if they
> would consider ensuring the channel is publicly logged? (where "No" is a
> valid answer to that request, assuming $reasons)
>
> Does that seem like a reasonable proposal to everyone, even if it doesn't go
> quite so far as to either not change anything on the one hand, or enforce
> that everything is logged on the other?

+1 from me with a few points to consider:

* who's the "owner"? Can that easily / programmatically be determined?
I suppose if it's registered with chanserv, not sure if all relevant
channels are.
* let's still figure out how to make "logged and googleable" obvious
to people in those channels
* are we going to suggest/establish a particular place/procedure for
those logs to be published? How do people find out where that is?

~F
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to