On 28/01/2015 19:52, Fred Wenzel wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
<[email protected]> wrote:
So, strawman (which IMO is reasonable): can we check irc.m.o for
currently-public channels with 10 or more people in that are not currently
being publicly logged, which are clearly project/product-related (rather
than watercooler chat stuff), and ask channel owners for all of them if they
would consider ensuring the channel is publicly logged? (where "No" is a
valid answer to that request, assuming $reasons)
Does that seem like a reasonable proposal to everyone, even if it doesn't go
quite so far as to either not change anything on the one hand, or enforce
that everything is logged on the other?
+1 from me with a few points to consider:
* who's the "owner"? Can that easily / programmatically be determined?
I suppose if it's registered with chanserv, not sure if all relevant
channels are.
Chanserv is what I had in mind, failing that we could check with the ops
in the channel.
* let's still figure out how to make "logged and googleable" obvious
to people in those channels
IMO /topic should have a link. If there is too much in there to do that,
assuming we centralize this it should be clear to everyone.
* are we going to suggest/establish a particular place/procedure for
those logs to be published? How do people find out where that is?
The de facto standard place seems to be http://logs.glob.uno/ (CC'ing
glob, who AFAIK is running this). I don't know if there's interest in
moving that somewhere more mozilla-official-y. I wouldn't much care
either way, but I guess we could check with IT, who already admin the
IRC server anyway, if other people do feel strongly?
If there is a lack of objection within the next week or so / general
agreement on this plan, Benjamin, could you drive this?
~ Gijs
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
