David More wrote:
Tim, it is simply not enough to do anything that will make a difference
I believe. And its goes to 2009 - then what - no recurrent funds committed.
Note: I believe these are good things to do - just not much will really
happen with the proposed funds - and the risk of underinvestment is that
all of it will be wasted like the $49.5 spent on HealthConnect to date
(largely)
David,
Aren't you just re-stating the e-health project failure cycle that
Boston Consulting outlined in their report in 2004?
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
