See earlier or later (as you see fit) reply.

Horses for courses - it is a free world. Any body who wishes can choose to
exclude themselves.

The people with the money are not making these objections and those who
object are not prepared to pay for anything -- except Medical Director, of
course.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of ash
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:20 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Details of Public Coag Outcome



David de Bhál wrote:
> No, we just have to deal with 'tyre kickers' like Horst who is far to pure
> for our purposes. He would 'never' use it anyway. Same for some of the
> purists.
> 
> Again, the vast majority of our clients are not too worried.

so presumably some are
> 
> We are market oriented as well as patient oriented.

so why not include more market, rather than irritate them, by using 
source that renders in firefox

m$ has the market by the short and curlies, but anyone with a minor nerd 
leaning favours firefox for too many reaons to elaborate; i still use 
windoze exclusvely, but i detest ie for the inferior browser it is, 
quite independently of its security problems

> Lets face it out there nobody cares as much as Horst.

but if they care at all you are alienating your potential buyers for no 
benefit other than make yourdeveloper get away with laziness

best wishes

ash
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk


_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to