On 18/05/2006, at 10:25 PM, Chris wrote:
Is there a reason why each one wants to use their own proprietary
downloader
and put their own application within the supposedly secure area of the
practice network?
Well there isn't a *good* reason.
Healthlink are a smart company,
What makes you say that? Healthlink are the only one I've encountered
that try to insist on installing their app on a server rather than a
workstation. When I took them to task, they sent me a list of about
19 silly reasons and 1 good one. Until it matures into something more
reliable and less resource heavy, Java has no rightful place on a
server and the less apps installed there the better.
Until these companies realise that we want a standard *lightweight*
download client, I suggest using as few of them as possible, and
installing the minimum number of these onto two workstations, with
one copy turned off.
Peter.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
