So why can't MO and Argus agree to share directories at least?
Jim Glaspole
Vermont Medical Clinic
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Hello Ross,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 8:57:49 AM, you wrote:
Argus is not open, the
directory is protected, we could easily and automatically send to
Argus users if it was, but this would damage their ability to sell the
sending software.
RD> Where did you get that one from???
RD> The only 2 reasons that the LDAP directory (Argus Users Directory) is
RD> not entirely open are
RD> 1) A reasonable base of users (GPs) specifically insisted that it be
RD> closed to only Argus users. and
RD> 2) It reduces the incidence of SPAM.
RD> Nothing to do with 'selling' or commercial advantage.
Well its either open or its not, it seems "NOT" is the answer,
whichever way you explain it. We are more than happy to cooperate if
you are willing to give us access to the directory. I can see the
reason for not making it open to Russian hackers, as spam is a huge
problem with EMail.
If Argus messages are compliant with standards then you should have
them certified, as you say its just a matter of submitting a batch of
messages.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
