On Monday 12 February 2007 6:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hopefully this will change in the next 3 years due to it being compulsory > for 3rd Standards Accreditation,RACGP. > > Of note though, many practices rushed through their next accreditation > visits before 31st Dec 06 just to avoid 3rd Standards. This is why it will > be 3 years for some to address the backup/restore issue. > > fee > except that it is already in the PIP IT incentives standard. jh _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Cedric Meyerowitz
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech David Guest
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Horst Herb
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Cedric Meyerowitz
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech David Guest
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Cedric Meyerowitz
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech fliss2
- [GPCG_TALK] Re: 3rd Standards Cedric Meyerowitz
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Re: 3rd Standards fliss2
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Re: 3rd Standards Cedric Meyerowitz
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech john hilton
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech fliss2
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Andrew
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech James
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Les Ferguson
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Oliver Frank
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech David Guest
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Andrew
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Peter Machell
- Re: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech John Mackenzie
- RE: [GPCG_TALK] Open letter to Medtech Andrew
