On Feb 10, 3:21 pm, Romy <[email protected]> wrote: > You've obviously never ran a business. People complain because you've > introduced a pain point and they still care about the product. It's > not their responsibility to come up with possible solutions and you > can't count on constructive criticism.
This isn't a business. Greasemonkey is open source and all of its contributor are volunteers. We work in a community to get ideas and opinions on how things should be done. Pretty much the only way to get something added to Greasemonkey is to start a discussion. > Writing angry reviews isn't childish, it's part of the feedback loop > and it's on you to find a constructive way to deal with it. People can leave constructive reviews. For instance a constructive review would be something like, "Could you please add the ability to edit @include and @exclude rules in the new manager. I relied on that feature and I would very much like it re-added. Thanks." As opposed to, "The new manager sucks and doesn't work like the old one. Bring the old one back! I'm downgrading until this is fixed." As you can see, the constructive review identifies the part of Greasemonkey that the user would like changed, whereas the other review is indeed childish and until helpful. My review was directed at those people who were writing reviews like the latter type. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
