First of all, I'd like to be clear that my review(the one SilverWave quoted) was just my personal opinion and I wasn't attempting to speak for other GM devs.
On Feb 9, 2:24 pm, SilverWave <[email protected]> wrote: > "No one is forcing you to update. But myself and the other devs are > going to work to improve GM not maintain the status quo, so please > refrain from making useless negative reviews in protest." > > Well of course the number of people bothering to complain is going to > be low after reading that! That's actually what I was going for. Complaining doesn't help anyone. If you have constructive criticism, I'd be glad to listen to it, but writing angry reviews because you're pissed GM has changed is just childish. You on the other hand followed my advice and contacted us in a place that we can give feedback(although your post are pretty hostile and not constructive), rather than just posting a one-star review to which no one can really respond. I've never been opposed to re-adding the ability to change @include and @exclude rules via some sort of graphical editor accessible in the new manager. I'd love to hear opinions on how people think that should look and function, as well knowing how many people would actually use it. I won't however support going back to the old manager, because that is just a step backward. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
