On Feb 10, 4:28 pm, Mr Warper <[email protected]> wrote: > make it so that the includes/excludes it reports are read from the scripts, > and so that any new rules are incorporated to the scripts headers instead > to an XML database.
The only problem with this is that editing a script via automated means can get tricky. There isn't a guarantee that an installed script even has a metadata block, since installing a script without one isn't forbidden. We could probably find work-arounds for most cases. So far I'm +1 on this change because it bridges the gap between experienced users who can edit the script and average users who just need something quick and simple, but I would still like to hear more opinions on the matter. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "greasemonkey-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
