Hello,
sizzlemctwizzle wrote:
...
On Feb 9, 2:24 pm, SilverWave <[email protected]> wrote:
...
please
refrain from making useless negative reviews in protest."
Well of course the number of people bothering to complain is going to
be low after reading that!
That's actually what I was going for. Complaining doesn't help anyone.
If you have constructive criticism, I'd be glad to listen to it, but
writing angry reviews because you're pissed GM has changed is just
childish.
...
Agreed. Now I'll tell you what I think that can be done about it. We can discuss
it if you want to, you can ditch it entirely or you can implement it; it's up
to you.
Bring back the old UI to manage includes/excludes, but make it so that the
includes/excludes it reports are read from the scripts, and so that any new
rules are incorporated to the scripts headers instead to an XML database. That
way everyone wins: 'we developers' have all the metadata where they belong, and
'we users' do not need to manually edit scripts if we don't want to; just type
an URL and hit OK/up/down/whatever.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"greasemonkey-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/greasemonkey-users?hl=en.
