> democratically oriented moderation.. Anivar, A framework is called for. I think one who is antagonised should occupy that space.
I may please be vacated from that *moderating* space, or, this list may have to bear with more such *non-working moderation* - accidental, out of ignorance or otherwise. [Personally, I am against a moderation exercise, because the after-effect of a moderation will already start working (within the individual) the moment everyone gets a copy of *an undesirable communication* - which is the unmoderated message. It will be the one's own reputation that will take the beating which can be best compensated by more sensible postings and less derogatory ones.] I look forward to more ideas or information from Rajeender - or whoever he is - and I refuse to place him under any stigma - a thinking which goes against the value-system of a moderator - hence my request. Issues like SEZs or Smart City, however, are not on a virtual space - its real. I think laisse faire, if allowed on real space will have more damaging effects for life, and hence I am unable to allocate any room for thinking on other issues - at least for the time being. Creation of a new situation that is capable of producing an increasing number of voiceless and defenseless people, demands my attention. CK Raju --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ greenyouth mailinglist is the activist support mailinglist for kerala To post to this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
