one more clarificatiom, I was not sitting on judgement on anything.... when I said that I do not know reajeender or devika, I was not trying to be "objective", I was expressing my opinions within the subjective realities of the multiple identities I engeage with
On 10/06/07, Bobby Kunhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hold on....... > i was just commenting about censorship, as a from of pemalising.... I was > not aware of the other mails that Rajeender sent dileep or devika, further I > thought Anivar clarified those with his mail on cyber-bullying. > Arunima, I am aware of the role of the womens movement vis-a-vis UCC and > Murali I do not think UCC addresses sexuality in any ways in the way it was > formulated even by the feministf movement and am willing to engage in any > conversation regarding that.... as a separate thread > The only point I was trying to make was censorship was not an answer and I > stand by it..... but when one gets offensive and ,makes personal threats, > thats a completely different issue and foes into the domain of criminality > Regards > > > On 10/06/07, Mustafa Desamangalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > dear sanil, > > i don't think that anyone consciously looking for somebody to put them > > under moderation. > > the censorship is kind of compulsory action. but the word aim its > > aim for the moderation very close to democratic function. some kind of > > moderation needed for healthy discussion. this is that we should > > understand very clearly. here what happened the same thing only. please > > stop the such an argument now. > > > > On 6/8/07, sanil v <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have been a regular and keen reader of this list. I > > > strongly protest against putting Rajeender under > > > moderation. His use of the so called "gender specific > > > and sexuality specific oppressive comments" were well > > > within the limits of digital-activist parlance. In > > > facts his comments and devika's well argued response > > > brought in a lot of fresh thoughts into this list. Let > > > us be vigilant against political correctness impossing > > > itself as dignified censorship. > > > > > > Sanil.V > > > > > > > > > --- Anivar Aravind < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is under moderation now Because > > > > of Following > > > > Reasons > > > > > > > > * Repeated usage of Gender Specific & > > > > Sexuality Specific > > > > Oppressive comments > > > > > > > > * Abusing people through personal mails as > > > > a Follow up of > > > > discussion on this thread. > > > > > > > > His post will appear on this list only after the > > > > approval of a > > > > moderator of this list. > > > > This is the second Time Rajeender put Under > > > > Moderation. > > > > > > > > This shows the need of forming Listrules for > > > > GreenYouth list > > > > I will Post a draft List rules within 2-3 days > > > > > > > > Rajeender, You can still post to the list. But I > > > > request you to > > > > Participate in discussions in a positive way > > > > > > > > Anivar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your > > > story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. > > > http://sims.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Bobby Kunhu > C1/5, SDA, New Delhi - 110 016 > Phone - +91-11-46021460 > -- Bobby Kunhu C1/5, SDA, New Delhi - 110 016 Phone - +91-11-46021460 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ greenyouth mailinglist is the activist support mailinglist for kerala To post to this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
