i cant imagine a worry in his mail for condoms get advertised here. On 8/6/07, aryakrishnan ramakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Salim and others, > > It should have been mentioned as Condom, I think Padmanabhan's opposition > is largely based on the fact that we shouldn't give publicity to any > particular condom company. I agree. Why should we give advertisement for the > brands in our own forums? > > Thanks > Aryan > > > On 8/6/07, salimtk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > what is depressing in 'nirodh'? r u suggesting for 'kamasutra' or > > 'moods'? > > what is the 'smartness' of police? > > > > > > On 8/6/07, vt padmanabhan vt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear all who have posted their thoughts on this topic. > > > > > > I really find the headline depressing. I think the > > > reference is to the "discovery" of condoms in his > > > workplace by some smart police officer. > > > > > > Padmanabhan VT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Murali K Warier < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > I quite frequently see the 'we' moniker used in this > > > > forum in relation to a > > > > range of topics, but nobody finds any brahminical > > > > conspiracy nor attempts to > > > > impose idiosyncrasies in them. Be that as it may, > > > > the last two posts remind > > > > me of a comment about 'pre-emptive blogging' by a > > > > blogger: > > > > > > > > 1. We criticize X (where X represents a person, a > > > > government or a political > > > > movement). > > > > > > > > 2. One or more commenters responds, not with a > > > > direct defense of X, but with > > > > "What about Y (where Y represents a person, a > > > > government or a political > > > > movement for which we supposedly have more > > > > sympathy), who did something we > > > > consider just as bad, if not worse." > > > > > > > > 3. Despite protestations (of subject-changing, > > > > unfair moral equivalence, > > > > etc.), the commenters of paragraph 2 believe they > > > > have achieved stalemate, > > > > if not checkmate. > > > > Venugopalan and Ranjit made several wrong > > > > assumptions about me, but the most > > > > prominent ones among them are that I am a religious > > > > Hindu and that I am > > > > sympathetic to the 'Y', that is Hindutva. The > > > > insistence that everybody > > > > prove their secular credentials by bashing Hindutva > > > > whenever they criticize > > > > other equally pernicious identity politics from > > > > other parties, according to > > > > me is fundamentally no different from the RSS > > > > insistence that Muslims prove > > > > their patriotism. > > > > > > > > Identity politics is bad, whether practiced by > > > > Madani, RSS or Narayana > > > > Panicker. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Murali. > > > > > > > > On 8/5/07, Venugopalan K M < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A Hindu believes what he likes to believe /what he > > > > wants to believe. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a > > > > statistic. > > > > - Joseph Stalin > > > > > > > > To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is > > > > unnecessary. > > > > These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. > > > > This is a > > > > revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold > > > > killing > > > > machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the > > > > pedagogy > > > > of the paredon (The Wall)! > > > > - Che Guevara > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Ready > > > for the edge of your seat? > > > Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. > > > http://tv.yahoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > undermining capitalism while the rest of the left is > > still trying to form committees." > > -- Jeremy Hardy, The Guardian (UK) > > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
