--- CK VISHWANATH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:00 PM, C.K. Vishwanath
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am with all the subaltern sections including
> dalit
> >  muslims and dalit christians.Affirmative action
> >  programmes of india should be expanded to address
> the
> >  core issues of all these sections of the
> society.they
> >  have to get a fair share in land and other
> properties.
> >  --- ranju radha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  > yea i was refering to andre's stand only ..
> >  > in positive discrimination.... here the focus s
> >  > "upper" castes who r
> >  > discrminated
> >  > in reservation the focus is SC/ST?OBCs who r
> >  > discriminated
> >  > where will u stand?
> >  >
> >  >  i dont consider reservation as positive
> >  > discrmantion. for me it s
> >  > democratisation and equal opportunities..
> >  > a castest  "upper" caste d perceive it as
> >  > discrmination.. so goes the
> >  > arguemtns of meritocracy of
> anti-reservationsists...
> >  > and andre beteile. mn
> >  > srinivas, narayan murthy, etc
> >  > where do u stand?
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On 3/24/08, C.K. Vishwanath
> >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > I don't support prof.andre beteille's stand
> on
> >  > > reservation.I just mentioned the usage of
> him.And
> >  > he
> >  > > was against that durban conference as well.
> >  > > I wrote about this issue in frontier.Or
> else,you
> >  > can
> >  > > get it from google.
> >  > > After all, are these upper castes getting
> >  > reservations
> >  > > ?their privilege?what was the merit of 19th
> >  > century
> >  > > upper caste students of madras presidency
> >  > > college(dalit daiary by chandraben prasad.)
> >  > >
> >  > > --- ranju radha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > > for me, reservation and positive
> discrimination
> >  > are
> >  > > > different...
> >  > > > when u repeatedly use the term "positive
> >  > > > discrimination" instead of
> >  > > > "reservation", i think, it s a politiacl
> >  > statement
> >  > > > from a brahmincal stand
> >  > > > point... (and u belive that there is
> >  > discrmination
> >  > > > against the "upper"
> >  > > > caste// then u have evry right to use it...
> but
> >  > i
> >  > > > disagree....and everyone
> >  > > > knows  andre betteile's stand on
> reservation to
> >  > > > Sc/sts/obcs)
> >  > > >
> >  > > > my prbolm is with the imagination "dalits
> are
> >  > not
> >  > > > capable of "... they r
> >  > > > capable of any thing
> >  > > > the problm does not lies with them, but in
> the
> >  > > > structural inequalities
> >  > > > instead of addressing it the
> state/ngo/civil
> >  > society
> >  > > > blame the marginallised
> >  > > > and make them convenient preys of "social
> >  > Uplift"
> >  > > > ... this is no sense  deny
> >  > > > the role of state or other machinaries, but
> the
> >  > > > frmwork they emply seem to
> >  > > > be problematic....which need to be chnged//
> >  > > > chitralekha case is a good
> >  > > > example...
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > > On 3/23/08, C.K. Vishwanath
> >
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > Prof.andre beteile gave this coinage to
> indian
> >  > > > social
> >  > > > > thinking.
> >  > > > > --- venukm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > Dear Ranju,
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > "Hegemonic imaginations of such schemes
> >  > about
> >  > > > the
> >  > > > > > marginalized have to
> >  > > > > > be contested.
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > There is absolutely no disagreement.
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > <1."It won't be in the interests of
> dalits
> >  > to
> >  > > > assume
> >  > > > > > that they can't
> >  > > > > > possibly flourish without it"
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > >  I am afraid there is a little
> ambiguity
> >  > > > regarding
> >  > > > > > what is meant by
> >  > > > > > 'it'.
> >  > > > > > If 'it' means &includes
> >  > > > > > all those well intentioned
> interventions and
> >  > > > > > positive measures by an
> >  > > > > > inclusive State with a view to
> redeeming to
> >  > > > dalits
> >  > > > > > everything they had
> >  > > > > > long been forcibly deprived of,i will
> rather
> >  > > > > > maintain that their
> >  > > > > > interests will not be jeopardized by
> 'it'.
> >  > > > > >  Because of the factors of voilent
> >  > historical
> >  > > > > > deprivations against
> >  > > > > > them and the continuation of such
> social
> >  > order
> >  > > > till
> >  > > > > > the present ,their
> >  > > > > > being
> >  > > >
> backward,socially,educationally,economically
> >  > > > > > and in many other
> >  > > > > > ways,
> >  > > > > > is far from just being someone's
> assemption.
> >  > > > > > As large sections of the population 
> and in
> >  > the
> >  > > > > > absence of some
> >  > > > > > measures of "positive discrimination",
> that
> >  > they
> >  > > > are
> >  > > > > > not capable of
> >  > > > > > inching ahead to social ascendancy
> >  > > > > > is a truth independent of anybody's
> >  > assumption.
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > This does not mean (at least, in my
> >  > reference)
> >  > > > that
> >  > > > > > the State or other
> >  > > > > > social actors should attempt to deny
> the
> >  > dalits
> >  > > > the
> >  > > > > > right to have
> >  > > > > > say , or to air theie own visions of
> >  > progress .
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > <2."Is there discrimination? How?"
> >  > > > > > This is a question which i wish to
> address
> >  > only
> >  > > > in a
> >  > > > > > restricted
> >  > > > > > sense,in the context of the idea of
> >  > "positive
> >  > > > > > discrimination".You will
> >  > > > > > agree, this is not a special coinage
> >  > invented by
> 
=== message truncated ===



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to