>Sahodaraaa enthavaannu orginal interpretation nte meaning??? Is > original and the modern interpretation static; if yes WOW........
Depends on how you define modern. thiricharivundakanam ennu churukkam :) >Was scriptures available for all???? I really don't know. I have heard that they were not written initially and if that is true any tom dick and harry can hear it while others are reciting ;-) >And last bobinsaa I did not understand your "HE" theory no theories. HE = Knowledge period. 2009/2/27 ANIL VARGHESE <[email protected]> > > @Bobinson > > > "I am concerned only about the modern and possibily the original > interpretation only. I prefer to interpret "He" as knowledge. And I > don't think the scriptures are in any way connected to the modern day > Hinduism developed for attracting masses to polling booth. " > > Sahodaraaa enthavaannu orginal interpretation nte meaning??? Is > original and the modern interpretation static; if yes WOW........ > > "Quest of knowledge can be useful for all" > > Was scriptures available for all???? > > I heard from some where that someone's (forgive me Im not getting that > name) kaathil iyam was pured for listening to scriptures........ > > And last bobinsaa I did not understand your "HE" theory > > On Feb 27, 4:52 pm, bobinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >*Sambhookan and Ekalavyan were treated differently > > > > *But, politics was involved there too. Politics and cast system is very > > much involved there. And the power politics and caste system was always > > related in this part of the world. > > > > 2009/2/27 Afthab Ellath <[email protected]> > > > > > * *Sambhookan and Ekalavyan were treated differently* > > > Regards > > > > > Afthab Ellath > > > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Afthab Ellath <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> >> And I don't think the scriptures are in any way connected to the > modern > > >> day Hinduism developed for attracting masses to polling booth.... > > > > >> >> Quest of knowledge can be useful for all. (As per one of our old > > >> sayings the-hot-milk-cat one knowledge is even useful for animals) > > > > >> While quest of knowledge is useful for all, Sambhookan and Ekalavyan > were > > >> not treated differently, not for attracting masses to polling booth, > but by > > >> the ontological hierarchy of the very tradition itself in treating > this > > >> quest, that is now proposed as the "common wealth" > > > > >> Regards > > >> Afthab Ellath > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM, bobinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> I am concerned only about the modern and possibily the original > > >>> interpretation only. I prefer to interpret "He" as knowledge. > > > > >>> And I don't think the scriptures are in any way connected to the > modern > > >>> day Hinduism developed for attracting masses to polling booth. > > > > >>> >How is that Katho Upansihad sloka becomes a "greater common > property" of > > >>> all? > > > > >>> Quest of knowledge can be useful for all. (As per one of our old > sayings > > >>> the-hot-milk-cat one knowledge is even useful for animals) > > > > >>> >secondly, I think many has pointed out here the combination of > taliban > > >>> with saffron. "saffron clad talbans" soemhow denotes saffron as some > what > > >>> "innocent". (am refering to saffron as metonym). Even in a precisley > > >>> "agraharic" issue, why should we bring in Taliban without any reason? > The > > >>> very reference to "saffron" is enough to make the point. > > > > >>> I agree with you. But I don't think its in anyway make them innocent. > > >>> Saffron started selectively abusing women like Taliban. Until last > election > > >>> this anti-female side was not very prominent like this election > season. That > > >>> was why I used the term "saffron clad taliban". And I think it sounds > good > > >>> as saffron and taliban considers each other as acid and base and like > acid > > >>> and base both are dangerous for human race. (As in if you drink acid > and > > >>> base instead of water or add to water to change pH etc) > > > > >>> As for your second mail I don't me or anyone "geninely" here in this > > >>> group will need an explanation but as you said its good for the kind > of > > >>> people you intended it for. :-) > > > > >>> 2009/2/27 damodar prasad <[email protected]> > > > > >>> May I also add that: some one out there, perhaps not active here, > would > > >>>> definitely think that if two personas with xian and muslim sounding > name has > > >>>> no particular issue with this "sloka" recital, why then a > caste-hindu, > > >>>> damodar prasad raise such issues. > > >>>> Why should d,prasad wants to "maintain" the difference. > > > > >>>> I think the -no-doubt- resolution- point of tradition as a greater > > >>>> common wealth of all has to be challenged? Why modern-nation leaves > out > > >>>> "other" traditons while narrwoing down it to a selected past? ? Is > there an > > >>>> ideoloy in this fabricated consent over tradition? Does this consent > refers > > >>>> to "one-nation" obedient theory? For me these are important > questions. Hence > > >>>> the reason why I raised those queries... > > > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:40 PM, damodar prasad < > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>> Dear Ashik and bobinson, > > >>>>> I may have a few doubts. How is that Katho Upansihad sloka becomes > a > > >>>>> "greater common property" of all? > > >>>>> The paraphrase of this sloka is this: > > >>>>> *May He protect both of us. May He nourish both of us. May we both > > >>>>> acquire the capacity > > >>>>> (to study and understand the scriptures). May our study be > brilliant. > > >>>>> May we not argue > > >>>>> with each other. Om peace, peac*e, *peace.* > > >>>>> Yes, one can interpret in it modern context. But how does it become > an > > >>>>> invocation song of modern technology institution?How can > religious ( and > > >>>>> bramhnical) scriptural sloka be integtrated to this endevour of > learning? > > >>>>> Interestingly, one "*inappropriate"* image in the signatue part is > the > > >>>>> "rose". "lotus" image would've integarted well with the lyric, bg > bit and > > >>>>> sloka. > > >>>>> secondly, I think many has pointed out here the combination of > taliban > > >>>>> with saffron. "saffron clad talbans" soemhow denotes saffron as > some what > > >>>>> "innocent". (am refering to saffron as metonym). Even in a > precisley > > >>>>> "agraharic" issue, why should we bring in Taliban without any > reason? The > > >>>>> very reference to "saffron" is enough to make the point. > > > > >>>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:08 PM, ashik salahudeen < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >>>>>> You are correct bobinson. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
