On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:27 PM, subscriber3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If something completes immediately, it > > doesn't need a Growl notification, and if you're standing around > > waiting for it, you don't need one, either. > > my bad. I thought: > > Growl lets Mac OS X applications unintrusively tell you when things > happen. > http://www.growl.info/ That's text that was put there because an Adium developer complained about the previous text that we have. We've gone through about a billion revisions to try to relay what Growl does. > > > > > that does not mean the user wants to manually close the notification, > > > or > > > that the user wants every notification to linger for an extended time. > > > > So, you want the ability to set the notification time per notification > > as well as per display? > > yes. > That seems somewhat counterintuitive. I don't see how an end user could configure that in a sane UI. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
