On Aug 30, 8:32 am, Chris Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My understanding is.. well let's go with an example. Say you had 2 > notifications for omnigrowl, both are for the same iCal type of event > (I don't know if omnigrowl does ical, but bear with me). My > understanding is that he wanted to configure it so that one could be > on screen indefinitely, while the other could be there with a 15 > minute timeout. > > Did I misread/misinterpret something somewhere? > basically, yes. you are comparing two events of the same type.
I am thinking more of, for example, an iCal event vs an RSS event an iCal event probably should be closed manually, but closing every RSS event is a nuisance, and a momentary RSS event could be easily missed. right now, it may be possible to have a "constant" RSS event that updates it's contents but I think it better to have an RSS event that lingers. in theory, OG could let me set the "lifetime" for RSS events and then pass it as a parameter to Growl. "the difference between theory and reality is that in theory there is no difference, but in reality there is." douglas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
