I just plain ol' wouldn't allow that. I'm of the mind that pretty much
EVERY roleplaying system out there is pretty broken. Believe me; my players
have found chinks in the armor of every last one that we've ever tried.
It's the GM's responsibility to keep game balance even if it means sometimes
taking a hardline "No you can't do that" type of stance. My players all got
used to that one pretty quickly, and sometimes we even have a lot of fun
coming up with exactly why they can't do that in terms of the campaign
world.
On 8/17/06, Eric Funk <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snipped>
>
> And in 3e using extended Magery rules the 205 points you spent on
> IQ+Magery would buy IQ17 + Magery-7, which is only one point lower in
> terms of IQ+Magery, still lets you buy all spells at 20+ for one
> point,
> and makes your mental skills even cheaper. How is 4e more broken?
My Players would probably choose IQ13 + Magery 14 and get all H spells at
25
with 1cp... :)
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l
--
In LVX,
{Anituel [Alam Uri Chay'rem][AACh = 10][The Concealed Mystery shining in
Darkness]}
http://fraterachdae.livejournal.com/
http://www.myspace.com/ngrahamoccult
"The ideals which have lighted my way, and time after time have given me new
courage to face life cheerfully, have been Kindness, Beauty, and Truth. The
trite subjects of human efforts, possessions, outward success, luxury have
always seemed to me contemptible." - Albert Einstein
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l
