Hal replied to me:
> Hi Onno,
>   I probably should have listed the URL for people to look at for their
> own instead of using my listing.  The Block Co-efficient was .62 in the
> formula - which can be varied depending upon the hull.  Unfortunately, I'm not
> conversant enough to know which direction the Block Co-efficient is supposed
> to change.  I get the feeling that the closer the Block Coefficient gets
> to 1, the more it resembles an actual rectangular shape with no curves,
> while the closer it gets towards 0, the slimmer the hull is with perhaps a
> deeper cutting centerline.  But, it is a step in the right direction :)
> 
>         Hal

Hello Hal,

I think there are two factors at work. First, there is the block
coefficient, which describes the shape below the waterline, and 
then there is the ratio between the draft and the depth (how 
much of the ship is above the waterline). 

There were countless variations, refinements, and experiments 
during the age of sail, but by and large I'd expect very similar
values for both parameters in all line of battle ships. The 
lowermost gunports had to be high enough, and more gun decks 
required a deeper hold for stability. When designers went too
far, they'd get a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasa_(ship) (the
story is a bit more complicated, of course).

Regards,
Onno
_______________________________________________
GurpsNet-L mailing list <[email protected]>
http://mail.sjgames.com/mailman/listinfo/gurpsnet-l

Reply via email to