There was an article in the N&O this morning regarding this topic, but it didn't sound so onerous.
Sam Quattrocchi _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mary dorsey Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 9:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Gyros: 15339] FW: [jlows] Fwd: Proposed NC law to restrict/kill group rides Have any of you all heard of this piece of legislation? I haven't but wanted to forward it on. Perhaps someone knows more than I. mary _____ Subject: Proposed NC law to restrict/kill group rides Matt's mention of the Tuesday ride prompts me to note that fans of that ride, as well as the P ride or just about any group ride should have their eye on a piece of legislation that just got proposed in the NC house. You can read the text of the proposed amendment here: http://blogs. <http://blogs.newsobserver.com/crosstown/legislation-would-boost-motorists-l everage-with-tow-truckers-and-with-bicyclists?storylink=misearch#ixzz0naAfLM gg> newsobserver.com/crosstown/legislation-would-boost-motorists-leverage-with-t ow-truckers-and-with-bicyclists?storylink=misearch#ixzz0naAfLMgg This law would kill most group rides. It makes it illegal for cyclists to: - ride more than two abreast, even temporarily (like dropping off the front) and even if the road is totally empty - ride more than one abreast when there is faster car traffic on the road. If you're on the front, you're there for good, and if fast cyclists encounter slow cyclists, they *can't* pass, so that cars *can* - "impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic," thereby letting us know what the bill's authors think of bike traffic -- we're unnormal and unreasonable For the first time *ever* in NC vehicle law, the amendment would: - create a special sub-class of vehicle users, namely cyclists, with more limited rights than other classes. The rest of the vehicle code treats all road users the same, with the same rights and responsibilities. - revoke cyclists' rights to the full lane when needed, with no qualifications mentioned for safety, lane conditions, whether we're about to take a left turn, or any of the other nuances in similar parts of the vehicle code. - place the responsibility to ensure that a pass is safe on the overtaken vehicle (the cyclist) rather than the overtaking one - penalize vehicle operators (cyclists) for their behavior as a group rather than individuals: cars aren't required to make sure that other cars follow the speed limits, but cyclists would be required to make sure that other riders move over, or the entire group is punished Some of the things the amendment outlines are, indeed, examples of good road courtesy on the part of cyclists, but there's a reason we don't usually try to legislate courtesy -- legislation is too heavy-handed a tool for this application. What we're really seeing, it seems to me, is an ignorance on behalf of the bill's author (a retired auto dealer) to acknowledge that two- or even three-abreast often *is* the safest and easiest way -- for cars as well as cyclists -- to co-exist on the road. Instead of trying to understand that by entering into the cyclists' position on the road, they're trying to legislate us off the road. Fuming -- Adam Reply <mailto:[email protected]?subject=fwd:%20Proposed%20NC%20law%20to%20restr ict/kill%20group%20rides> to sender | Reply <mailto:[email protected]?subject=fwd:%20Proposed%20NC%20law%20to%20rest rict/kill%20group%20rides> to group | Reply <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jlows/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJwN24xdWllBF9TAzk3MzU5N zE0BGdycElkAzE4NjY1MzA5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDk1MARtc2dJZAM3OTEEc2VjA2Z0cgRzb GsDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMjczNjI0ODU3?act=reply&messageNum=791> via web post | <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jlows/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbnJla2Y4BF9TAzk3MzU5N zE0BGdycElkAzE4NjY1MzA5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDk1MARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0a W1lAzEyNzM2MjQ4NTc-> Start a New Topic Messages <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jlows/message/791;_ylc=X3oDMTMzaHZzcWoyBF9TAz k3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzE4NjY1MzA5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDk1MARtc2dJZAM3OTEEc2VjA2 Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMjczNjI0ODU3BHRwY0lkAzc5MQ--> in this topic (1) Recent Activity: * <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jlows/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJnZmdnaXJqBF9TAzk3Mz U5NzE0BGdycElkAzE4NjY1MzA5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDk1MARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycw RzdGltZQMxMjczNjI0ODU3?o=6> New Members 6 <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jlows;_ylc=X3oDMTJma2ppam0wBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BG dycElkAzE4NjY1MzA5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDk1MARzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAz EyNzM2MjQ4NTc-> Visit Your Group Safety Notice: No lifeguard on duty! Swim at your own risk. If you are new to open water swimming, or feel at all uncomfortable, ask someone to be your swim buddy BEFORE you start swimming. <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYzd0NWpsBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzE4N jY1MzA5BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MDk1MARzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTI3MzYyNDg1N w--> Yahoo! Groups Switch to: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=change%20delivery%20format :%20Traditional> Text-Only, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=email%20delivery:%20Digest> Daily Digest . <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> Unsubscribe . <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Use . <http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=18665309/grpspId=1705060950/msgI d=791/stime=1273624857/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3> __,_._,___ -- You received this message because you subscribed to the Gyro email group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] -- You received this message because you subscribed to the Gyro email group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]
